How many 55+ community profiles does 55NearMe list in Mesa, AZ?
4 public profiles as of Sep 2, 2026. Every profile keeps its sources, verification dates, and unknown fields visible.
55+ communities in Mesa, AZ
What 55+ community profiles are available in Mesa?
Mesa, AZ currently has 4 community profiles in the directory. The set includes single-family homes, condominiums, attached homes; 2 profiles have current price information and 3 have a listed fee amount. Open each profile for age descriptions, restrictions, source links, and last-checked dates. This city page is still under review.
Coverage in this place
What is actually documented in Mesa, AZ
Counted from the 4 public profiles on this page. These are counts of evidence on file, not a rating of the communities.
- Profiles here
- 4Across 1 city.
- With a price source
- 2 of 4A published or reported price range with a source.
- With a fee amount
- 2 of 4An HOA, POA, or recurring charge with a number attached. An unpublished fee is never $0.
- Meeting the listing standard
- 4 of 4At least two sources with one not third-party, a sourced age rule, a sourced price or fee, no conflicting core field, and a check date. These are the profiles that count toward this page existing.
- Sources Checked
- 0 of 4No profile here has been through the automated source check yet.
- With governing age language
- 0 of 4No governing document or public record cited for the age rule yet.
- Latest check
- The most recent verification date across these profiles. Older profiles were checked before this.
Every profile
4 communities in Mesa, AZ, side by side
The same fields for every profile, taken from the ledger. Open a profile for the full fee table, sources, and dates.
| Aerial | Community | City | Price | HOA / POA | Age policy | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Dreamland Villa | Mesa, AZ | High $200,000s to low $500,000s resale-market snapshot | Dreamland Villa Retirement Community states it is sustained by annual fees, but the current fee amount is not published on its official site | The organization's official page describes Dreamland Villa as age-restricted to persons 55 and older | |
 | Sunland Springs Village | Mesa, AZ | Mid $300,000s to mid $700,000s resale-market snapshot | A third-party profile reports HOA dues ranging from $52 to $276 per month across the community's mixed home products | The association homepage describes Sunland Springs Village as a premier 55+ active adult community | |
 | Sunland Village | Mesa, AZ | Current published price range not yet verified | Association homepage states a 2026 Annual Assessment of $777.70 | The association homepage describes Sunland Village as a residential 55+ community | |
| Sunland Village East | Mesa, AZ | Current published price range not yet verified | $917.00 annual dues for 2026 (January through December); a 10% late fee of $92.00 applies after February 15, 2026 | The HOA states buyers under 55 require Board of Directors and manager approval under its governing documents |
Evidence-triggered email
Fee digest for Scottsdale and the East Valley
We email only when sourced fees, rules, or profiles in Scottsdale and the East Valley change. No fixed schedule, no newsletter, no sales handoff.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Counts are derived from the 4 Mesa profiles in the ledger on the date shown, not from a template.
How many Mesa, AZ profiles have a sourced HOA or fee amount?
2 of 4 profiles carry a sourced fee amount as of Sep 2, 2026, and 2 carry a price signal. The rest show "Not published as of" the date they were checked, never $0.
What is the range of sourced HOA dues in Mesa, AZ?
Across the 2 profiles with a sourced HOA amount, monthly-equivalent dues run from about $778 at Sunland Village to about $917 at Sunland Village East as of Sep 2, 2026. Annual and quarterly dues are divided to a monthly figure for comparison only; the original billing schedule stays on each profile.
What remains unverified in Mesa, AZ?
As of Sep 2, 2026, 1 profile lack a sourced HOA amount, 2 lack a verified price range, and 4 rely on marketing language rather than a governing age document. Those fields stay visible as unknown until a source is attached.